12
Jul
|
Design & Stats
|
3 of My Conclusions
|
- IV Payoff irrelevant information: results for people in other countries (Control); cohorts in out-group; non-cohorts in in-group or out-group
- Participants able to choose kind and source of feedback on those who have previously played the game (info has normative value)
|
- Small convenience sample (n=
- 10 hours of game-playing: practice effects, boredom, fatigue
- They also controlled for reciprocity motivations; why separate the whole? Conformity includes feelings of r.
- Why muddy the waters with the 3rd treatment group? Why not measure in-group alone?
- Overall, the paper focuses on the effects of the findings of Ash
|
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5c6e34e7-2451-4581-9d2c-ca3efcdf1ad8)
