14
Dec
Dec
The Surprisingness Coeeficient (S): Milgram’s study and big effect sizes
Unexpectedly Big Effect Sizes: The Milgram Study
Image by Vicki’s Nature via Flickr
The subjective estimates of expected behaviours of others was part of Milgram’s (1963) study of obedience. His sample of observers estimated that an average of 1.2% of participants would use maximum shock on a an unknown subject. Actually, 65% of participants administered maximum shock treatment when ordered to.
The distance between the subjective (expected) estimate and the actual (raw) estimate, has been labeled the surprisingness coefficient (S).
Related articles by Zemanta
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=471828d3-2b89-4822-9415-64c984a9904a)
No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
